Atheists were behind the elimination of prayer in school. They are the impetus behind the movement to eradicate "In God We Trust" from our money and "Under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance. They say they do not believe in God and find the reference offensive.
Their reasoning is illogical. How is someone offended by something that doesn't exist? Since they believe God doesn't exist what is the nexus for the offense. A true atheist could not be offended.
If I proclaimed I got heartburn from drinking distilled water, people would know I was lying or woefully misinformed. Distilled water is one of the few substances that cannot produce heartburn. It may manifest itself by moving heartburn causing material to a sensitive area of the stomach, but water was not the cause.
I believe the activist atheist is offended because he does believe in God. They don't like God's moral standards and thus repudiate God. These activist atheist are offended every time they see the word "God" because it mocks their public profession of non-belief.
Another lie of the activist atheist is their desire to help others see the truth. To what purpose? Without God there are no moral standards. Without God there is nothing after an earthly death. An atheist thus has to live in the now. Why would an atheist have altruistic tendencies? If they receive no benefit from an action what is their motive?
A true atheist would only debate the existence of God as a dispassionate intellectual pursuit. Any other form of discussion is evidence of being in denial about their belief. Witnessing about Christ to them doesn't start with Jesus. It starts with how did this world come into existence?
When they agree to some "unknown cosmic force. " You reply "Like God?"
No comments:
Post a Comment